ELIJAH'S MANTLE, JOHN'S MINISTRY: THE CONTINUITY OF THE ELIJAHIC PROPHETIC OFFICE IN THE NEW TESTAMENT
An Exegetical and Christological Study of 2 Kings 1:8, Malachi 4:5–6, Luke 1:17 and Matthew 3:4
By Da Effiong Daniel
African Holy Land Research Centre
African Holy Land Press
Independent Research Publication
---
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The relationship between Elijah the prophet and John the Baptist is one of the most significant prophetic connections in the Bible. It brings together the prophetic history of the Old Testament and the messianic revelation of the New Testament.
Elijah was a prophet who confronted the spiritual corruption of Israel, challenged the worship of Baal and called the nation back to the worship of Yahweh. Centuries later, John the Baptist appeared in the wilderness, calling Israel to repentance and preparing the way for the coming Messiah.
The striking connection between these two men raises important theological questions. Why did Jesus identify John with Elijah? Why did John deny being Elijah when questioned? What is the significance of their similar clothing? Did John inherit Elijah's prophetic mantle? Were they performing the same ministry, or were they fulfilling different assignments within one divine purpose?
The angel Gabriel provides an important answer when he announces John's birth to Zacharias:
«“And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.”
— Luke 1:17, KJV»
This declaration establishes the theological foundation of the relationship. John was not Elijah physically returned to the earth. Rather, he came in the spirit and power of Elijah, fulfilling the prophetic expectation associated with Elijah's promised appearance.
This study examines the continuity of the Elijahic prophetic office, the similarities and differences between Elijah and John, the Christological significance of their ministries, and the distinction between prophetic identity and prophetic assignment.
The central argument is that God does not necessarily reproduce the personality, appearance, circumstances or methods of a previous prophet when continuing a prophetic purpose. He remains the same God, but His servants may have different personalities and distinct assignments.
2.0 ELIJAH: THE PROPHET OF COVENANT CONFRONTATION
Elijah emerged during the reign of Ahab, king of Israel, when the worship of Baal had become a serious national and religious problem.
Through Jezebel's influence, Baal worship gained political support, while the prophets of Yahweh faced persecution.
Elijah's ministry was therefore not merely a demonstration of supernatural power. It was a covenantal confrontation against idolatry and the abandonment of the worship of the living God.
In 1 Kings 18, Elijah confronted the prophets of Baal on Mount Carmel. His question to Israel was direct:
«“How long halt ye between two opinions? if the LORD be God, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him.”
— 1 Kings 18:21, KJV»
The central issue was allegiance. Israel could not continue to claim covenant relationship with Yahweh while participating in the worship of another god.
Elijah repaired the broken altar of the LORD, arranged the sacrifice and called upon Yahweh. God's response by fire demonstrated that Yahweh, not Baal, was the living God.
The restoration of the altar in 1 Kings 18:30–31 is especially significant. Before the people could respond to the demonstration of divine power, Elijah repaired the altar that had been broken down.
His ministry therefore involved confrontation, restoration and the call to covenant faithfulness.
3.0 THE APPEARANCE AND MANTLE OF ELIJAH
The Bible provides a distinctive description of Elijah's appearance.
When Ahaziah's messengers returned and described the man they had encountered, the king recognised the description:
«“He was an hairy man, and girt with a girdle of leather about his loins. And he said, It is Elijah the Tishbite.”
— 2 Kings 1:8, KJV»
Elijah's clothing became a recognisable feature of his prophetic identity.
The mantle also appears in the succession narrative involving Elisha. In 1 Kings 19:19, Elijah cast his mantle upon Elisha, symbolising the prophetic calling and succession that would follow.
Later, in 2 Kings 2:13–14, Elisha took up Elijah's mantle after Elijah was taken away.
The mantle therefore carries an important biblical association with prophetic succession.
However, the connection between Elijah and John must be carefully distinguished from the transfer of the mantle to Elisha.
Scripture explicitly describes John's relationship with Elijah in terms of the spirit and power of Elijah. It does not say that Elijah's physical mantle was transferred to John.
The mantle provides a useful theological illustration of prophetic continuity, but John's calling is explained directly by Luke 1:17.
4.0 MALACHI'S PROPHECY AND THE EXPECTATION OF ELIJAH
The prophetic expectation of Elijah's coming is found in the closing chapter of Malachi.
«“Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD.”
— Malachi 4:5, KJV»
The following verse explains the purpose of this prophetic appearance:
«“And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse.”
— Malachi 4:6, KJV»
The prophecy is concerned with restoration. The appearance of Elijah is associated with turning hearts, repairing broken relationships and preparing people for the day of the Lord.
This expectation became important in the New Testament because the Jewish people were awaiting the fulfilment of prophetic promises.
When John appeared in the wilderness, his ministry of repentance and preparation corresponded with the purpose described by Malachi.
Gabriel's announcement in Luke 1:17 makes the connection explicit: John would go before the Lord in the spirit and power of Elijah.
5.0 JOHN THE BAPTIST: THE ELIJAHIC PROPHETIC MINISTRY
John the Baptist appeared in the wilderness preaching repentance and announcing the nearness of the Kingdom of Heaven.
Matthew records:
«“In those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the wilderness of Judaea,
And saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”
— Matthew 3:1–2, KJV»
John's ministry was preparatory. He was not the Messiah, but the messenger sent before Him.
His assignment was to prepare the people to receive the One who was coming after him.
The similarity between John's ministry and Elijah's ministry is not accidental within the biblical narrative. Both confronted spiritual unfaithfulness, called people back to God and stood against powerful systems that opposed righteousness.
Elijah confronted Ahab and the worship of Baal. John confronted Herod Antipas over his unlawful relationship with Herodias.
Their historical circumstances were different, but both demonstrated that prophetic responsibility could require speaking truth before political authority.
John's ministry, however, moved beyond the confrontation of sin to the identification of the Messiah.
He declared:
«“Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.”
— John 1:29, KJV»
This declaration brings the Elijahic prophetic pattern into its Christological fulfilment. John was not merely calling people away from wrongdoing; he was directing them towards Jesus Christ.
6.0 THE MEANING OF THE SPIRIT AND POWER OF ELIAS
Luke 1:17 contains the expression:
en pneumati kai dynamei Ēliou.
It means “in the spirit and power of Elijah.”
This expression describes the prophetic character, authority and assignment in which John would minister.
It does not mean that Elijah's personal spirit entered John, nor does it establish reincarnation.
The distinction is essential because the Bible presents Elijah and John as two different historical persons.
Elijah lived and ministered during the period of the divided monarchy. John appeared centuries later, during the period of Roman rule in Judea.
The continuity is therefore prophetic rather than personal.
John carried a ministry that corresponded with the prophetic expectation associated with Elijah. He confronted spiritual corruption, called people to repentance and prepared the way for the Lord.
The name Elijah itself is significant. The Hebrew name Eliyahu (אֵלִיָּהוּ) is commonly understood to mean “My God is Yahweh” or “Yahweh is my God.”
The name is not literally translated as “Jah is King.” The Hebrew word for king is melek, which is not part of Elijah's name.
Nevertheless, the meaning of Elijah's name agrees with the central message of his ministry: Yahweh alone is God.
7.0 SAME OFFICE, DIFFERENT PERSONALITIES, SAME GOD
The relationship between Elijah and John the Baptist reveals an important principle of divine service: God can continue a prophetic purpose through different personalities without making the servants identical.
Elijah and John shared a prophetic pattern, but their personalities, circumstances and specific responsibilities were not identical.
7.1 Same Clothes: A Striking Prophetic Correspondence
The Bible describes Elijah as:
«“An hairy man, and girt with a girdle of leather about his loins.”
— 2 Kings 1:8, KJV»
Matthew describes John:
«“And the same John had his raiment of camel's hair, and a leathern girdle about his loins; and his meat was locusts and wild honey.”
— Matthew 3:4, KJV»
The resemblance is remarkable.
Both men were associated with distinctive garments involving animal hair and a leather girdle. Their clothing distinguished them from the ordinary appearance of people in their respective societies.
This correspondence reinforces the literary and prophetic relationship between Elijah and John.
However, Scripture does not explicitly state that God instructed John to reproduce Elijah's clothing. It is therefore more accurate to identify the similarity as a significant biblical correspondence than to claim that the text records a direct divine instruction concerning John's dress.
The clothing may be interpreted as a visible expression of prophetic separation, but the primary biblical evidence for John's Elijahic assignment remains Luke 1:17.
7.2 Same Ministry: The Voice That Confronts Its Generation
Both Elijah and John were associated with prophetic confrontation.
Elijah confronted Ahab over the worship of Baal and Israel's abandonment of Yahweh.
John confronted Herod Antipas over his relationship with Herodias.
Elijah called Israel to choose between Yahweh and Baal. John called Israel to repentance and preparation for the coming Messiah.
Both ministries challenged the spiritual condition of their generations.
The connection is especially clear when Luke 1:17 is read alongside Malachi 4:5–6.
John's assignment was to turn hearts and prepare a people for the Lord.
The prophetic office, therefore, was not simply about supernatural manifestations. It involved moral responsibility, spiritual correction and preparation for God's purpose.
7.3 Different Personalities: Elijah's Dramatic Confrontation and John's Self-Effacing Witness
Although Elijah and John shared a prophetic pattern, their personalities and expressions were not identical.
Elijah's ministry included dramatic confrontations. On Mount Carmel, he challenged the prophets of Baal and called upon Yahweh to answer by fire.
His ministry also included a moment of human vulnerability. After Jezebel threatened his life, Elijah fled and became discouraged (1 Kings 19:1–18).
This reminds us that prophetic authority does not remove human weakness or emotional struggle.
John's ministry displayed a different emphasis. Jesus described him as:
«“He was a burning and a shining light.”
— John 5:35, KJV»
John's humility was particularly evident in his attitude towards Jesus.
He declared:
«“He must increase, but I must decrease.”
— John 3:30, KJV»
He also confessed that he was not worthy to bear or unloose the shoes of the One coming after him (Matthew 3:11; John 1:27).
Elijah's ministry was marked by dramatic covenant confrontation, while John's ministry was marked by preparation and the public identification of the Messiah.
Yet John was not timid. He confronted Herod despite the consequences, and Elijah was not without vulnerability.
The lesson is not that one prophet was courageous and the other gentle. Both demonstrated courage, but their personalities and specific expressions of ministry differed.
The same God does not require every servant to possess the same temperament.
7.4 Different Diets: The Same God Provides in Different Ways
Their wilderness experiences also reveal an interesting contrast.
Elijah was fed by ravens:
«“And the ravens brought him bread and flesh in the morning, and bread and flesh in the evening; and he drank of the brook.”
— 1 Kings 17:6, KJV»
Later, when Elijah was exhausted under the juniper tree, an angel provided food and water for him (1 Kings 19:5–7).
John's diet was different:
«“And his meat was locusts and wild honey.”
— Matthew 3:4, KJV»
Elijah received food through ravens and angelic provision. John ate locusts and wild honey in the wilderness.
The comparison illustrates that divine provision does not always follow one pattern.
The same God who sustained Elijah through unusual provision also sustained John in a different wilderness environment.
Their diets do not establish that John never received supernatural assistance, nor do they prove that every detail of their provision was identical in theological meaning.
The central principle is that God's faithfulness is not limited to one method of provision.
7.5 Same Prophetic Purpose, Different Specific Assignments
Elijah's ministry included the restoration of the broken altar of the LORD.
«“And Elijah took twelve stones, according to the number of the tribes of the sons of Jacob...”
— 1 Kings 18:31, KJV»
The restoration of the altar represented a call to return to covenant faithfulness.
John's ministry, however, was directed towards preparing people for the Messiah.
When he saw Jesus, he declared:
«“Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.”
— John 1:29, KJV»
In a theological illustration, one may say that Elijah repaired the broken altar, while John pointed to the Lamb who would accomplish the redemptive purpose of God.
This expression must be understood as a theological comparison, not as a literal biblical title given to Jesus by John. The actual biblical declaration is that Jesus is the Lamb of God.
Elijah called Israel back to Yahweh. John prepared the people to recognise Jesus Christ.
The two assignments were related, but they were not identical.
7.6 Same Divine Source: Different Historical Expressions
Luke 1:17 identifies the source of John's prophetic assignment as the spirit and power of Elijah.
First Peter 1:10–11 provides a wider Christological perspective on prophetic inspiration:
«“Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.”
— 1 Peter 1:11, KJV»
Peter explains that the prophets of old spoke through the Spirit of Christ.
This does not mean that every action of Elijah was a direct prediction of a particular event in Jesus' earthly life. Rather, it establishes that the prophetic witness of Scripture ultimately belongs within God's redemptive purpose in Christ.
Revelation 19:10 further declares:
«“For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.”
— Revelation 19:10, KJV»
The testimony of Jesus is central to biblical prophecy.
Elijah and John lived in different historical periods, carried distinct assignments and expressed their ministries through different personalities. Nevertheless, their ministries belong to the wider prophetic witness that directs attention towards God's redemptive purpose.
7.7 A Lesson for the Present Generation
The relationship between Elijah and John provides an important lesson for those who understand themselves to have a calling or responsibility in God's service.
Do not confuse the continuity of divine purpose with the imitation of another person's personality.
A person may learn from Elijah's courage without attempting to reproduce every expression of Elijah's ministry. Another may learn from John's humility without assuming that every servant must possess the same temperament.
The lesson is:
- Do not copy another person's personality; remain faithful to your assignment.
- Do not compete over another person's provision; trust God to sustain you.
- Do not measure your calling by another person's manifestations.
- Do not confuse a shared divine purpose with identical responsibilities.
- Let every ministry direct attention towards Jesus Christ.
This principle must also be applied carefully. Not every believer occupies the unique prophetic office associated with Elijah or John. The broader lesson is that God works through different people, circumstances and gifts while remaining faithful to His purpose.
Same God. Different servants. Different personalities. Different provisions. Distinct assignments. One divine purpose.
8.0 DID JOHN CLAIM TO BE ELIJAH?
In John 1:21, the religious authorities asked John directly:
«“Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not.”
— John 1:21, KJV»
This statement appears to create a contradiction when compared with Jesus' identification of John as Elijah.
However, the apparent contradiction disappears when personal identity is distinguished from prophetic fulfilment.
John denied being Elijah as a literal historical person. He was not claiming to be the same individual who had confronted Ahab centuries earlier.
Jesus, however, identified John as the fulfilment of the Elijah expectation.
In Matthew 11:14, Jesus declared:
«“And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come.”
— Matthew 11:14, KJV»
In Matthew 17:10–13, Jesus again connected the Elijah expectation with John the Baptist.
Jesus was not teaching that John was Elijah reincarnated. He was identifying John as the one who fulfilled the prophetic role anticipated in Malachi.
John's denial and Jesus' identification therefore address different questions.
John answered the question of personal identity. Jesus explained the prophetic significance of John's ministry.
9.0 ELIJAH, JOHN AND THE CONFRONTATION OF POLITICAL POWER
Elijah and John both confronted rulers whose conduct contradicted the righteousness of God.
Elijah confronted Ahab and the religious system supported by Jezebel. His ministry included the dramatic judgment against the prophets of Baal at Mount Carmel.
First Kings 18:19 identifies 450 prophets of Baal and also mentions 400 prophets of the groves. First Kings 18:40 specifically records the killing of the 450 prophets of Baal.
These numbers should not be carelessly combined.
Elijah's actions occurred within the particular covenantal and judicial context narrated in Israel's history.
John's confrontation with Herod was different.
John declared that it was not lawful for Herod to have Herodias, his brother Philip's wife (Matthew 14:3–4).
John did not kill Herod. He was imprisoned and eventually beheaded.
The distinction between these historical events is important. Elijah's confrontation involved a specific judgment against the prophets of Baal, while John's confrontation involved moral rebuke of a political ruler.
Both prophets demonstrated courage, but their methods and historical circumstances were different.
10.0 THE SPIRIT OF CHRIST IN THE PROPHETS OF OLD
First Peter 1:10–11 offers an important theological connection between Old Testament prophecy and the revelation of Christ.
Peter explains that the prophets searched concerning the salvation that would be revealed and that the Spirit of Christ within them testified beforehand about the sufferings of Christ and the glory that would follow.
This means that the prophetic witness of the Old Testament cannot be separated from the wider redemptive purpose fulfilled in Jesus.
Elijah's ministry confronted idolatry and called Israel back to Yahweh. John's ministry prepared people for the coming Messiah. Both belong to the unfolding biblical witness that reaches its fulfilment in Christ.
This does not mean that Elijah knew every detail of the New Testament revelation or that every event in his ministry was a direct prediction of Jesus.
Rather, the Spirit of Christ was at work in the prophetic witness of Scripture, directing God's redemptive purpose towards its fulfilment.
11.0 THE SPIRIT OF PROPHECY AND THE REVELATION OF JESUS CHRIST
Revelation 19:10 states:
«“For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.”
— Revelation 19:10, KJV»
This declaration provides a Christological centre for understanding the prophetic ministry.
The purpose of biblical prophecy is not to make the prophet the centre of attention. Its ultimate testimony points towards Jesus Christ.
John's ministry illustrates this principle.
In John 1:31–34, he explains that he came baptising with water so that Jesus might be made manifest to Israel.
John also describes the sign by which the One who sent him identified Jesus: the Spirit descending and remaining upon Him.
He then testified:
«“And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God.”
— John 1:34, KJV»
John's statement that he did not know Jesus in John 1:31 and 33 should be understood within the context of his divinely given recognition of Jesus as the Messiah.
It does not necessarily mean that John had never encountered Jesus as a human being. Rather, the passage explains that John received a divine sign by which Jesus was identified to him.
The text does not say that John recognised Jesus through Elijah's personal spirit.
The emphasis is on the testimony of the One who sent John and the divine sign of the descending Spirit.
The result was that John identified Jesus as the Son of God.
12.0 JESUS CHRIST: THE FULFILMENT OF THE PROPHETIC WITNESS
Elijah confronted idolatry. John prepared the way. Jesus Christ came as the fulfilment of God's redemptive purpose.
The distinction between their ministries becomes especially important when considering the Kingdom of God.
Elijah's ministry included the judgment of the prophets of Baal. John confronted Herod and suffered imprisonment and death. Jesus, however, did not establish His earthly messianic Kingdom by killing His opponents.
When a Samaritan village refused to receive Him, His disciples James and John asked whether they should command fire to come down from heaven.
Jesus rebuked them (Luke 9:54–56).
When Peter used a sword during Jesus' arrest, Jesus commanded him to put it away:
«“Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.”
— Matthew 26:52, KJV»
Jesus also declared:
«“My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight...”
— John 18:36, KJV»
These passages show that Jesus did not establish His earthly messianic Kingdom through violent retaliation against His opponents.
This does not mean that Scripture denies divine judgment. It means that the redemptive mission of Jesus was accomplished through His obedience, suffering, death and resurrection.
John pointed to Jesus as the Lamb of God. Jesus became the centre of the redemptive revelation towards which the prophetic witness had been moving.
The progression can therefore be expressed as follows:
Elijah — Confrontation and restoration.
John — Repentance and preparation.
Jesus Christ — Redemption and the revelation of the Kingdom.
The prophetic witness finds its centre and fulfilment in Christ.
13.0 THEOLOGICAL SYNTHESIS
The biblical relationship between Elijah and John reveals several important theological principles.
First, prophetic continuity does not require personal identity. John was not Elijah physically returned to the earth, but he fulfilled the Elijahic expectation through the spirit and power of Elijah.
Second, similarity does not eliminate distinction. Their clothing, wilderness settings, prophetic courage and confrontation of unrighteousness reveal a meaningful correspondence, but their personalities and historical responsibilities remained distinct.
Third, divine provision is not limited to one method. Elijah was fed by ravens and received angelic assistance, while John ate locusts and wild honey. The same God sustained His servants in different circumstances.
Fourth, prophetic authority is not measured by dramatic manifestations alone. Elijah's confrontation on Mount Carmel and John's witness before Herod were different expressions of courage and obedience.
Fifth, the prophetic witness is Christ-centred. First Peter 1:10–11 and Revelation 19:10 establish the relationship between the Spirit of Christ, the prophets and the testimony of Jesus.
Finally, the continuity of divine purpose must never become an excuse for personality imitation or historical exaggeration.
The prophet is not the fulfilment of the prophetic message. Jesus Christ is its centre.
14.0 CONCLUSION
Elijah and John the Baptist stand as two remarkable figures in the biblical history of prophetic ministry.
Elijah confronted the idolatry of Israel, challenged the authority of Ahab and restored the broken altar of the LORD.
John appeared centuries later, preaching repentance, confronting Herod and preparing the way for Jesus Christ.
Their clothing reveals a striking correspondence. Their ministries demonstrate prophetic continuity. Their personalities and circumstances reveal important differences. Their experiences of provision show that the same God can sustain His servants through different means.
Yet the greatest connection between them is not their clothing, diet, temperament or dramatic experiences.
It is their place within God's unfolding redemptive purpose.
Elijah called Israel back to Yahweh. John prepared Israel to recognise the Messiah. Jesus Christ came as the Lamb of God, accomplishing redemption and revealing the Kingdom.
The lesson for our generation is clear:
Do not imitate another person's personality when God has given you a distinct assignment. Do not compete with another person's provision when the same God is able to sustain you. Do not make the servant greater than the One whom the servant is called to reveal.
Elijah was Elijah. John was John. But the God who worked through both remained the same.
And above every prophetic mantle, every prophetic personality and every prophetic assignment stands Jesus Christ.
One Christ. One Gospel. One Kingdom.
---
BIBLICAL REFERENCES
All biblical quotations in this study are from the King James Version (KJV), unless otherwise indicated.
- 1 Kings 17:5–6 — Elijah's provision through ravens.
- 1 Kings 18:19–21 — Elijah confronts the prophets of Baal and calls Israel to choose.
- 1 Kings 18:30–40 — Restoration of the altar and the confrontation on Mount Carmel.
- 1 Kings 19:1–18 — Elijah's flight, discouragement and divine encouragement.
- 1 Kings 19:19 — Elijah calls Elisha.
- 2 Kings 1:8 — Elijah's appearance.
- 2 Kings 2:13–14 — Elisha takes up Elijah's mantle.
- Malachi 4:5–6 — The promise of Elijah and the turning of hearts.
- Matthew 3:1–4 — John's wilderness ministry and appearance.
- Matthew 3:11 — John's declaration concerning the One coming after him.
- Matthew 11:14 — Jesus identifies John with the Elijah expectation.
- Matthew 14:3–10 — John's confrontation with Herod and his death.
- Matthew 17:10–13 — Jesus explains the fulfilment of the Elijah expectation.
- Matthew 26:52 — Jesus commands Peter to put away his sword.
- Luke 1:17 — John comes in the spirit and power of Elijah.
- Luke 9:54–56 — Jesus rebukes the proposal to call down fire.
- John 1:21 — John denies being Elijah.
- John 1:27 — John's declaration of unworthiness.
- John 1:29 — Jesus identified as the Lamb of God.
- John 1:31–34 — John's testimony concerning Jesus.
- John 3:30 — Christ must increase.
- John 5:35 — Jesus describes John as a burning and shining light.
- John 18:36 — Jesus explains the nature of His Kingdom.
- 1 Peter 1:10–11 — The Spirit of Christ in the prophets.
- Revelation 19:10 — The testimony of Jesus and the spirit of prophecy.
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Brown, R. E. (1993). The birth of the Messiah: A commentary on the infancy narratives in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke (Updated ed.). Doubleday.
Cogan, M. (2001). 1 Kings: A new translation with introduction and commentary. Doubleday.
France, R. T. (2007). The Gospel of Matthew. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Green, J. B. (1997). The Gospel of Luke. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Hill, A. E. (1998). Malachi: A new translation with introduction and commentary. Doubleday.
Jobes, K. H. (2005). 1 Peter. Baker Academic.
Keener, C. S. (1999). A commentary on the Gospel of Matthew. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Nolland, J. (2005). The Gospel of Matthew: A commentary on the Greek text. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
ABOUT THE RESEARCHER
Da Effiong Daniel is a Nigerian independent researcher, theological writer, sociologist and anthropologist, and Founder and Director of the African Holy Land Research Centre (AHLRC).
His research explores biblical theology, prophetic interpretation, African religious history, indigenous institutions, cultural anthropology and the relationship between Scripture and African historical experience.
Through African Holy Land Research Centre and African Holy Land Press, he develops independent research publications intended to encourage biblical reflection, historical inquiry and Christ-centred theological understanding.
His research approach recognises the importance of distinguishing scriptural interpretation, historical documentation, cultural evidence and prophetic testimony.
Researcher: Da Effiong Daniel
Institution: African Holy Land Research Centre
Publisher: African Holy Land Press
Publication Type: Independent Research Publication
African Holy Land | Ubon Abasi Ibom | Israel in Africa
One Christ. One Gospel. One Kingdom.
Comments
Post a Comment